Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SAHAKARI DUDH MAHASANGH MARYADIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 20, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Dudh Mahasangh Maryadit Mumbai. The preliminary hearing in the matter was held on Sh. Ashish Salvi, Accountant and Sh. Vishnu Salunkhe Dy. Manager Distribution ap...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These two petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to release them on bail in O.R.No.40/2018-19 for the offence punishable under Section 132 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter in short called as G.S.T.Act). 2. I have heard Sri. Ravi.B.Naik, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Jeevan.J.Neeralgi, learned standing counsel for GST Commissionerate. 3.The gist of the allegation made against the petitioners is that the petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Writ Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent, the Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to enable the petitioner to file GST TRAN 1 electronically and treat the same as filed in accordance with law. 2. Heard Mr.B.Raveendran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 & 2. There is no representation on behalf of the third respondent...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R These two petitions have been filed by petitioners – accused under Section 438 of Cr.P.C to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in O.R.No.40/2018-19 by the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 137 of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Hereinafter it has been used as ‘GST Act’ for short). 2. I have heard learned senior counsel Sri C.V. Nagesh for petitioners and learned standing counsel Sri Jeevan J. Neeralgi for resp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HYVA INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 18, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. Hyva India Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :- a. What is the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NARSINGH TRANSPORT


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Feb 18, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and MPSGT Act respectively) by M/s. Narsingh Transport, Indore (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TEWARI WAREHOUSING CO. PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Feb 18, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be supplying warehousing services, is constructing a warehouse on leasehold land, using pre-fabricated technology. According to the Applicant, it can be dismantled and reconstructed at a different location. He seeks a ruling on whether the input tax credit is admissible on the inward supplies for construction of the said warehouse. The above question is admissible under section 97(2)(d) of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HP INDIA SALES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 17, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAH NANJI NAGSI EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 16, 2019)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. What will be the correct HSN code and consequently rate of GST applicable on “Ready to cook popcorn premix i.e. Popcorn Maize with edible...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs: “(i) Declare that the provisions of section 174(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 should be read down so as to make it intravires the Constitution of India as amended by the Constitution (One and Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016; and (ii) Declare that the Exhibit P3 show cause notice issued by the 2nd respondent is ultra vires the Constitution of India as amended by the Constitution (One and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


16
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).