Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

LAXMI AGROTECH STEEL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Apr 16, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The issue raised by M/s. Laxmi Agrotech Steel, H-85, Road No. 5A, RIICO Bindayaka, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302012 (here in after the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Section 97 (2) (a) given as ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Criminal Petition No.2484/2019 is filed by Mr. Mahendra Kumar Singhi and Criminal Petition No.2485/2019 is filed by Mrs. Suman Mahendra Kumar Singhi, wife of the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.2484/2019 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in proceedings No. ADCOM/ENF/SZ/ACCT.03/INS./2018-19, dated 9.1.2019. 2. I have heard Sri Ravi B.Naik, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nitin Ramesh, the l...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition for Revision of Declaration in From GST Tran-I as per Rule 120-A of the Central Goods and Service Rules, 2017 and for allowing the transitional Credit as per Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017. An affidavit has been filed by the respondent/Union of India and the same reads as under:- “A F F I D A V I T I, the deponent take oath and state as under:- 1. My name : Shyam Mangal Father's Name : S...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Vide order dated 12.04.2019, this Court had directed the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bhavnagar to ensure that the original file pertaining to the impugned order is produced before this Court for its perusal. 2. In compliance of the said order, the original file is produced before this Court, a perusal of which reveals that no satisfaction has been recorded by the concerned officer that for the purpose of protecting the interest of the government revenue, it is necessary to make an...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Challenging the rejection of transitional relief in terms of sections 73 and 74 of the Telagnana Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Act’) read with Rule 121 thereto, and a consequential demand made for the alleged excess claim of transitional relief, the Dealer has come up with the above writ petition. 2. Heard Mr. P. Anil Mukharji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. J. Anil Kumar, learned Special Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The pet...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This writ petition has been preferred for getting CENVAT credit under Rule 117 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017 in FORM GST TRAN-1 to be provided by the respondents. There are difficulties with the attempt made by this petitioner because the same was not available online and hence, this petition has been preferred so that respondents can decide the representation of this writ petitioner. 2. Having heard counsels for the both sides and looking to the facts and circumst...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

V.V. ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 15, 2019)

Note : Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DAIMLER FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 15, 2019)

Note Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GANDHAR OIL REFINERY (INDIA) LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 15, 2019)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by GANDHAR OIL REFINERY (INDIA) LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. WHETHER APPLICANT REQUIRES REGISTRATION IN EACH STATE SEPERATELY? At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAH..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 13, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/S. CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of fo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).