Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,471 Results

VINAYAK TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 25, 2019)

Short Summary:
The court heard arguments from both parties and issued a rule to be returned on a specified date. As an interim measure, the court directed the immediate release of the attachment on the petitioner’..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court addressed two writ petitions filed by dealers seeking a mandamus to credit their Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounts to the Electronic Credit Ledger under GST. The petitioners had failed to file ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court addressed grievances regarding detention and seizure of goods under Section 129 of the GST Acts. The petitioners, claiming to be owners and consignors with accompanying documents, sought rel..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Oct 25, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DECCAN TOBACCO COMPANY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Oct 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Deccan Tobacco Company, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. NAGPUR INTEGRATED TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Oct 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A.K. OVERSEAS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 24, 2019)

Short Summary:
The court observed that although the State Tax Officer obtained an extension for inspecting goods and conveyance, no inspection report in Form GST MOV-4 was prepared within the extended period. Despit..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court directed the opposite parties to file a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed the petitioners to file a rejoinder affidavit within one week thereafter. It held that if the petition..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the detention and tax penalty order under section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act and related state GST laws. It held that the question of whether the petit..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ICE CREAM MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 24, 2019)

Short Summary:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of certain GST notifications that classified ice cream at par with products like pan masala and tobacco, alleging arbitrariness violating..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
8
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o May 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o May 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o May 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o May 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o May 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).