Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,453 Results

M/S. JVS FOODS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Nov 28, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ALISHA FOODS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Nov 28, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and MP Goods and services Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s. ALISHA FOODS (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The provisions ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court upheld the detention of goods and vehicles due to the incorrect vehicle number on the E-way Bill, constituting non-compliance with Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act. However, recognizing that..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court allowed the petitions concerning taxpayers' inability to claim input tax credit due to filing procedural issues with Forms GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 under the CGST Act. It recognized that the st..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's order permitting the petitioner to file Form GST TRAN-2 despite an inadvertent omission in Form GST TRAN-1 during the early GST regime. The ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court held that the detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act was unjustified, as the reasons given for detention were irrelevant to the statutory requirements. The transaction inv..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court addressed a case involving the detention of a conveyance under the GST framework. The conveyance was accompanied by valid invoices and e-way bills, and physical verification revealed no disc..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This Report dated 03.04.2019 and the supplementary Report dated 30.05.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the Case that vide his application dated 06.04.2018 submitted the Uttar Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 12B (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applic....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court addressed the challenge to the denial of an extension request for filing the TRAN-1 form under the GST Act. It observed that the issue had already been settled by a previous order dated 19.1..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MR. GOPIRUATH DOMBLA, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PRO.. vs. NAVKAR ASSOCIATES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 26, 2019)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 07 D6.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering had forwarded an application dated 17.04,2018 filed by the Applicant No. 1 to the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
6
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o May 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o May 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o May 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o May 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o May 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).