Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,382 Results

M/S. GEETASTAR RESORTS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Nov 26, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KPC PROJECTS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Nov 25, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s KPC Project Limited, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Servi....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. Gajendra Jain for the Applicant and Ms. Asha Desai for the Respondents. 2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant seeks a stay on the operation of the Order-in-Original dated 10th January, 2019 and the Order-in-Original dated 19th August, 2019, made by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (Respondent No.3). 3. In the first place, we find that there is no substantive challenge to the Order-in-Original dated 19th August, 2019. In the absence of any sub....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Dr. A Saraf, learned senior counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned senior counsel for the respondents No.1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and Mr. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 as well as Mr. S.C Keyal, learned ASGI for the Customs Department. 2. Considering the conclusion of the learned Single Judge in the judgment and order dated 25.10.2109 in WP(C)No.7081/201 and the other connected writ petitions that the investigation revealed the commission ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Dr. A Saraf, learned senior counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned senior counsel for the respondents No.1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and Mr. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 as well as Mr. S.C Keyal, learned ASGI for the Customs Department. 2. Considering the conclusion of the learned Single Judge in the judgment and order dated 25.10.2109 in WP(C)No.7081/201 and the other connected writ petitions that the investigation revealed the commission ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Documents at Annexure P-17 are taken on record.   This order shall dispose of CWP-14192-2019 titled as “Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and others” and CWP-32868- 2019 titled as “Girdhari Lal Aggarwal Contractors Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Haryana and others”. For brevity, facts have been taken from CWP- 14192-2019. The petitioner namely, 'Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd.' ha....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. CMC VELLORE ASSOCIATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 25, 2019)

Note Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain prov....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SREE VARALAKSHMI MAHAAL LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 25, 2019)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KALYAN JEWELLERS INDIA LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 25, 2019)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. RB SHAH ENTERPRISES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 25, 2019)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
1
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o May 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o May 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o May 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o May 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o May 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).