Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court seeking its intervention for the purpose of restraining the respondent – North Central Railway Administration – to deduct any amount more than 2% in the name of tax from the bill of the writ petitioner. The petitioner claims to be a Railway Civil Contractor based at Allahabad. According to the petitioner, he had participated in a bid for execution of annual repairs and maintenance of zonal work for GM bungalow and officers qua...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. MANISH SAINI vs. M/S. RAMAPRASTHA PROMOTER & DEVELOPER PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Feb 14, 2020)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 14.06.2019, received on 17.06.2019 by this Authority, has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that a complaint dated 26.09.2018 was filed before the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of pu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SINGHAL'S FLEXIPACK vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, CGST & CENTRAL EXCISE


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Feb 13, 2020)

This appeal has been filed before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to as "the CGST Act") by M/s Singhal's Fiexipack, Plot No. E39A, RIICO Industrial Area, Bassi (Extn.), Bassi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Provisional Release Order issued under C.No. IV(6)138/AE/JPR/2017/1484 dated 29.11.2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugn...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Dated this the 13th day of February 2020 The petitioner, a proprietary business entity registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax / State Goods and Service Tax, has approached this Court under Article 226 challenging Exts.P3A to P3(n), whereby the assessment order under Section 2 of the State Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 has been passed, inter alia on the ground that the petitioner had, vide intimation dated 25.11.2019, informed regarding closure of the business. 2. Secondly, th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner on receipt of summons vide Annexure-1 from the Director General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence (DGGI), Bhubaneswar Zonal Unit has filed his reply and the matter is now pending in the CGST. Mr. T. K. Satapathy, learned counsel for the CGST submits that the proceeding has been initiated on the basis of Intelligence Report and some documents have been seized from the petitioner for the purpose of the proceeding. In the meantime, the OGST has initiated proceeding und...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner on receipt of summons vide Annexure-1 from the Director General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence (DGGI), Bhubaneswar Zonal Unit has filed his reply and the matter is now pending in the CGST. Mr. T. K. Satapathy, learned counsel for the CGST submits that the proceeding has been initiated on the basis of Intelligence Report and some documents have been seized from the petitioner for the purpose of the proceeding. In the meantime, the OGST has initiated proceeding und...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “a. To issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to direct respondent to release the goods and vehicle on payment of applicable tax and penalty in terms of clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 129 of the GGST/ CGST Act after being provided an opportunity of hearing under Sub-section (4) of the Se...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant writ petition, it appears that a statutory appeal filed by the writ petitioner under section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is pending before the Additional Commissioner, Grade-2, Appeal-2, Commercial Tax / SGST, Kanpur, being the respondent no. 4. Since a statutory appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner, he ought not to have approached the writ Court. The writ ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAMPAT SINGH


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Feb 12, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to as “the Act”) by Shri Sampat Singh Proprietor M/s. S.S. Stone, S-2. IInd Floor, Bharat Apartment, Gandhi Path, 176, Vidhut Nagar-C, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) against the Refund Sanction/Rejection Order No. CGST/DIV-G/71/2019-20, dated 2-9-2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the-impugned order”) filed under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer of quashing the demand raised vide Ext.P5, for returning the appeal preferred against the assessment order to be deficient of court fees, i.e., 1% of the disputed amount and with a further prayer of declaring imposition of levy of additional court fee by the State Authority in exercise of powers under Section 76(1) of the Kerala Court Fees Act would not apply in the field of GST laws. Petitioner being registered under the provisions of the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).