Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

BHAGWANDAS PURSHOTAMDAS


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Mar 16, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Act’) by M/s. Bhagwandas Purshotamdas, Dr. Nandlal Marg, Churi Bazar, Ajmer (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant” or “the supplier”) against Order-in-Original No. 01/HPK/GST/R-XLVI/2018-Supdt., dated 17-12-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order” also), passed by Superintendent, CGST Range-XLV...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present Writ Petition is directed against the action initiated by the respondents detaining the consignments invoices covered by Ext.P-1 and P-2 and detained by Ext.P-8 and P-9. 2. The learned counsel on the behalf of petitioner submits that the petitioner being a private limited company, established in the year 1984 had been working without any legal hassles. On the basis of the purchase order placed by the 3rd respondent at Kollam in Kerala, the petitioner being distributor of Godre...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The learned counsel for the Department says as of today the total GST liability of the petitioner qua Delhi is about ₹ 11.5 crores and for PAN India’s is ₹ 59.24 crores approximately. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner says there are 35,000 person on the rolls of the petitioner concern and its monthly expenditure bill runs to approximately ₹ 60.87 crores, hence freezing of its accounts is damaging the petitioner day by day. It is alleged the bona fide of t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Court: The writ petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for allowing the writ petitioner to file/upload in GST TRAN-1. The petitioners intend to file TRAN-1 Form and/or revised TRAN-1 Form. It is to be noted that the issue has been resolved by an order passed by this Court on March 4, 2020 in WP 17234(W) of 2019 along with several other writ petitions. In light of the same, I direct the GSTN authorities (Authority that manages the portal) to open the portal for the peti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

K.P. SUGANDH LTD. vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH


(Chhattisgarh High Court | Mar 16, 2020)

ORDER 1. Since the facts and grounds raised in both these writ petitions and the dates also being identical and the impugned orders also being same, both these writ petitions are being decided by this common judgment. 2. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 17.01.2020 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondents for the purpose of release of the vehicle carrying goods belonging to the petitioners from the manufacturing centers to the dealer. 3. The relevant...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THINKLAB EDUSOFT LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Mar 13, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARIHANT PLAST


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Mar 13, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act arc the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA vs. WILLOWOOD CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 13, 2020)

Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Parth S. Shah, the learned counsel, waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the opponents. This is an application at the instance of the original respondents of the Special Civil Application No.18591 of 2018 with the following prayers : “a) This Hon’ble Court is pleased to admit and allow this petition. b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to recall or review order dated 10.07.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No.18...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA vs. SARAF NATURAL STONE


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 13, 2020)

Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Vishal J. Dave, the learned standing counsel, waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the opponents. This is an application at the instance of the original respondents of the Special Civil Application No.15925 of 2018 with the following prayers : “a) This Hon’ble Court is pleased to admit and allow this petition. b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to recall or review order dated 10.07.2019 passed in Special Civil Applica...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER   Heard Mr. D. Saraf, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance and Taxation Department for respondent Nos. 2, 7, 8 & 9. The matter pertains to refusal of the system in uplodading the data to enable the petitioner to claim transitional credit of eligible duties in respect of stock held by the petitioner in terms of Section 140 of Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. According to the petitioner, the petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).