Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

M/S. SADGURU SEVA PARIDHAN PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 19, 2020)

1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Sadguru Seva Paridhan Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as SSPPL) on 20.12.2019 against Advance Ruling No. 33/WBAAR/2019-20 dated 11/11/2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as the WBAAR). 2. The appellant, holding GSTIN No.19AAGCS8830H1ZZ is a manufacturer of fusible interlining cloth, sought a ruling on whether the item is classifiable in Chapters 50 to 55 of the First Schedule of the Cu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MAGNAM NETLINK PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 19, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant has submitted that they are in the business of providing services of providing execution of works contract regarding EPC (engineering, procurement and construction/commissioning) solutions to dairy and food processing industry. They have been awarded a contract for design, construction, supply, installation and commissioning of a Dairy Plant for the Bihar State Milk Cooperative Federation Ltd. The said contract is divided into two parts viz:- Part - A: Civil ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TATA COFFEE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 19, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner a Private Limited Company engaged in manufacture and supply of fruit-based beverages/drinks registered in State of Kerala with GSTIN No.32AAACH3005MIZO. 2. According to the petitioner, the carbonated fruit drinks manufactured by them was classified under HSN 2202 9920 under GST and discharging GST @ 12% on all intra State and inter-State supplies. The codes have been specified under the Chapter XXII of GST Tariff Codes. In the aforementioned code in respect of fruit-based d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Mr. Saraswat, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2, submits that the case is squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 01.11.2019, rendered in the case of Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15221/2019]. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though in-principle, the issue is covered by the aforesaid judgment, but certain more directions/clarifications are required to be given so as to war...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 19.09.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed application dated 30.07.2018 (Annexure-1 of the Report) before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering stating that the Respondent No. 1 had resorted to profiteering...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

G.C. TILES


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Mar 18, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. G.C. Tiles (Truck Driver/Person-in-charge : Shri Anil Kumar Pal S/o Shri Ram Shankar), 3401, Opp. : Water Tank, Jaiprakash Nagar, Bariatu, Ranchi-834 009 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order No. IV(6)47/AE/Alwar/2018, dated 10-10-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by Assistant Commissioner (AE), Central Goods & Services ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. PRASA INFOCOM & POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 18, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively ] by M/s. Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. APAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 18, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of tin Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. APAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SUNDHARAMS PRIVATE LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 18, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. SUNDHARAMS PRIVATE. LTD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Whether a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).