Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,181 Results

SAURABH CHHAJER vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | Jun 1, 2020)

ORDER 1. Defect/s pointed out by the Registry is waived. 2. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Union of India through video conferencing. 3. Petitioner has filed third (interim) bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 4. Criminal Complaint No.34/2019 is pending before the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Jaipur Metropolitan for offence under Sections 132(1), (b), (c), (f), (g), (k), (i) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 20...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. UTTARAKHAND FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | May 29, 2020)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, 73-Nehru Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand (here in after referred to as 'the applicant*) is registered with the GSTN having Registration No. 05AAALU0009M0ZG and seeking advance ruling on the following questions in terms of Notification no. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017: ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. UTTARAKHAND FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | May 29, 2020)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, 73-Nehru Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand (here in after referred to as 'the applicant') is registered with the GSTN having Registration No. 05AAALU0009M0ZG and seeking advance ruling on the following question: a. What will be applicable rate for GST on royalty payable to Govt o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The matter has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the provisional attachment order dated 05th March, 2020 issued by respondent No.1 to the petitioner’s bankers. Learned counsel for petitioner states that in the absence of any notice issue...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAPIL DEV SHARMA vs. M/S. VIKAS PARKS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | May 27, 2020)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 06.12.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 20.02.2019 (Annexure-1) stating that the Respondent had resorted to profiteering in respect of the supply of construction services related to the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-Conferencing mode. 2. Mr. M. Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice or the respondent. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 13.05.2020 passed in GSTIN.No.33AANCS3782R1ZG. 4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order was passed in v...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJESH ARORA vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | May 26, 2020)

Order Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 15/2018 registered at Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Zonal Unit, Jaipur for offences under Sections 132(1)(B), (C), (D), (F), (I), (L) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2018. Maximum period of sentence that can be awarded in the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ID FRESH FOOD (INDIA) PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 22, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST TAX ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. ID Fresh Food (India) Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), # 37, Doddenakundi Industrial Area, Whitefield Road, Mahadevapura, Bengaluru-560 048, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAICM3930G1ZD, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of COST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. NCS PEARSON INC.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 22, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 1. M/S. NCS Pearson Inc. with User ID number 9918USA29031OSC, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act,2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each und...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R CM APPL. 11279/2020 Present application has been filed for early hearing on the ground that the issue involved in the present case is covered by the judgment in the case of Micromax Informatics Limited Vs. UOI and Ors., W.P. (C) 196/2019 & CM APPL. 965/2019 dated 5th May, 2020 rendered by the learned Predecessor Division Bench of which one of us (HMJ Sanjeev Narula) is the author. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the said judgment credit of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


16
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).