^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ZEN MACHINE TOOLS vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER – I & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

Rupesh Sharma

Res. Counsel

V.prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	ZEN MACHINE TOOLS
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER – I & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 9, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 20497 of 2024 and W. M. P. Nos. 22445 to 22447 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10638
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings dated 20.07.2023 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all notices/communications were uploaded by the respondent under the column, viz., "View Additional Notices and Orders", in the GST portal. Since the petitioner was not aware of the said notices, they failed to file their reply within the time. Under these circumstances, the impugned order came to be passed by the respondent without providing any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, the learned Government Advocate would submit that the respondent has uploaded the notices in the GST Online Portal. But the petitioner failed to avail the....