^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

WIPRO LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

JYOTI MULIMANI

Pet. Counsel

Venkatesh S. Arbatti

Res. Counsel

K.s. Anusuyadevi

Petitioner / Applicant	WIPRO LIMITED
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Jan 23, 2025
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 46612 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
Citation	2025(1) TAXREPLY 12348
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER Sri. Venkatesh S.Arbatti., counsel for the petitioner and Smt. K.S. Anusuyadevi., CGSC for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The short facts are these: The petitioner - WIPRO Limited Bangalore is engaged in the manufacture and export of Information Technology products. For the purpose of its exports and imports, the petitioner has been issued Import Export Code IEC No.0488006040 in terms of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993. The petitioner was conducting the business. As the matter stood thus, the petitioner received a show cause notice dated 23.03.2015 from the fifth respondent on behalf of the third respondent on 02.04.2015. The petitioner suitable replied to the notice on 21.04.2015. The Government considered the reply and it was brought to the notice of the petitioner that the documents submitted by it are not sufficient to consider the redemptions. The petitioner was al....