Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED AND ANR vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Pet. Counsel
Bharat Rai Chandani
Swapna Das
Sandeep Choraria
Res. Counsel
---

Petitioner / Applicant

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED AND ANR
Respondent UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Court Calcutta High Court
State

West Bengal

Date Mar 8, 2021
Order No.

WPO 50 of 2021

Citation

2021(3) TAXREPLY 4081
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by an order of rejection of refund dated March 2, 2020 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Park Street Division. The case of the petitioner is that this order of rejection was passed without granting any hearing to him. Counsel on behalf of the revenue submits that by a letter dated December 18, 2019, certain deficiencies in the application filed under Section 54 of the Act had been notified to the petitioner. He submits that these deficiencies were still required to be rectified. I have heard Counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials on record. In my view, this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction upon the officer concerned to grant one week time to the petitioner to rectify the deficiencies as per the letter dated December 18, 2019. The petitioner shall be required to rectify the above deficiencies within one we....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)