^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VM & CO. vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, RAMANATHAPURAM.
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

Pet. Counsel

Raja Karthikeyan

Res. Counsel

J.k.jayaselan

Petitioner / Applicant	VM & CO.
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER, RAMANATHAPURAM.
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Oct 25, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 25760 of 2024
Citation	2024(10) TAXREPLY 11592
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed, challenging the order, dated 12.07.2024, passed by the respondent, on the premise that the same has been made in violation of principles of natural justice, non-application of mind to the material on record, and also that is a non-speaking order. 2. The petitioner is engaged in execution of works contract. It is submitted that some of the works have been executed during the VAT regime and are stated to be subject to tax under the GST Act. Detailed replies have been filed by the petitioner in response to Form GST-DRC01A, dated 02.04.2024, whereby it was explained that the proposal to treat a sum of Rs. 42.86 crores as suppression was contrary to the facts inasmuch as out of the total receipts for the year 2017-2018 of Rs. 48.10 crores, Rs. 44.96 crores have been disclosed under the VAT regime and the sums received in respect of the works executed under the GST regime were only to the extent of Rs. 3.35 crores and in respect of the abov....