Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VIRAT METALS AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION vs. ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, SHRI. SANMATI ELECTRICALS, DELHI, M/S. VRL LOGISTICS LTD., GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL, NEW DELHI, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI AND STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S.V.BHATTI
Pet. Counsel
K.j.abraham
Nikhil John
Res. Counsel
Thushara James
P.vijayakumar

Petitioner / Applicant

VIRAT METALS AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Respondent ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, SHRI. SANMATI ELECTRICALS, DELHI, M/S. VRL LOGISTICS LTD., GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL, NEW DELHI, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI AND STATE OF KERALA, TAXES (B) DEPARTMENT, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Aug 6, 2019
Order No.

WP(C). No. 21032 OF 2019 (D)

Citation

2019(8) TAXREPLY 2042
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Heard Sri. K. J. Abraham learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Thushara James learned Government Pleader as well as Sri. P. Vijayakumar learned ASGI appearing for respondents no. 4 and 5. 2. The petitioner challenges Exts. P6 and P7 notices issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction. Ext. P6 is an order of detention made under Section 129 (1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Ext. P7 is a notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act. The petitioner contends that the subject matter of Exts. P6 and P7 is fully compliant with all the requirements of the Act and the petitioner was not in a position to demonstrate within the time given by the authorities that E-Way Bill was also generated could be produced for inspection. Therefore, the proceedings now initiated through Exts. P6 and P7 are not warranted and legal. 3. The learned Government Pleader objects to the maintainability of ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).