Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VINOD G. MANAGING PARTNER NATIONAL MOTORS vs. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING) , GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Pet. Counsel
Mohan George
Res. Counsel
P.r.sreejith
N.nagaresh
V.k.shamsudheen

Petitioner / Applicant

VINOD G. MANAGING PARTNER NATIONAL MOTORS

Respondent UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING) , GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Jun 14, 2018
Order No.

W.P. (C.) No.17473 of 2018

Citation

2018(6) TAXREPLY 2891

Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that he was unable to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 to take credit of input tax available to him at the time of migration, within the time stipulated. It is alleged by the petitioner that though he has attempted to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the time, he was not able to do so on account of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions so as to enable him to take credit of the input tax available to him at the time of migration. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader as also the learned Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case as also the orders passed in similar matters, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to prefer an application....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)