Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VIGHNAHARTA CONST. vs. STATE OF U.P & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHATIA
Pet. Counsel
Sachin Srivastava
Res. Counsel
Ratnesh Lal

Petitioner / Applicant

VIGHNAHARTA CONST.
Respondent STATE OF U.P & OTHERS
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Oct 18, 2023
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 143 of 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8147
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. The counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1, states that the respondent no.1 has been improperly described. From the records also, the said objection appears to be correct. However, the outcome of the writ petition would not get affected only because of improper description of respondent no.1, as such, after hearing the matter, the final orders are being passed in the matter. 2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner's firm is registered under the GST and is being taxed in accordance with law. It bears from the record that on 08.09.2020 a show cause notice was issued under section 61 of the GST Act and thereafter an order came to be passed under section 74(9) on 14.07.2021 whereby the demand has been confirmed against the petitioner and was directed to be paid. Thereafter the petitioner claimed that he was suffering from incurable disease and in that regard, he has annexed the medical ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).