^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VENEW DECORS vs. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER, THE MANAGER, SOUTH INDIA BANK CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

P.v.sudakar

Res. Counsel

V.prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	VENEW DECORS
Respondent	THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER, THE MANAGER, SOUTH INDIA BANK CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 30, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 11430 of 2024, W. M. P. Nos. 12538 & 12539 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10848
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An assessment order dated 23.08.2023 is challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner asserts that his GST registration was cancelled on 25.09.2019. In these circumstances, he states that he was shocked to be informed by his banker that his savings bank account was attached. Thereafter, he came to know about the impugned order. The present writ petition is filed in the said facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no reason to monitor the GST portal in view of the cancellation of the GST registration. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. He therefore seeks another opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 3. Mr. V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the first respondent. On instructions, he states that the show cause notice and personal hearing notices were not only uploaded on the GST port....