^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VEEKESY FOOTGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
DONADI RAMESH

Pet. Counsel

Atul Gupta

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	VEEKESY FOOTGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 15, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 710 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9673
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Challenge has been raised to the adjudication order dated 27.04.2024 imposing penalty under Section 129(1)(a) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. 3. At the outset, a preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents as to availability of statutory alternative remedy of appeal. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner would contend, the impugned order is perverse. It is in the teeth of the earlier order passed by this Court on the same point in law. 5. In face of statutory alternative remedy of appeal available and it being equally open to the petitioner to raise all grounds pressed in the present petition before the appeal authority, we are not inclined to offer any interference in exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction under....