^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VEDIAPPAN vs. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

Vignesh Venkat

Res. Counsel

E.ranganayaki

Petitioner / Applicant	VEDIAPPAN
Respondent	THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 22, 2023
Order No.	W.P.No. 22771 of 2023 And W.M.P.Nos. 22225 And 22226 of 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 8106
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for respective respondents. 2. Although in paragraph No.3 of the counter affidavit, the 6th respondent has stated that the Writ Petition is not maintainable either on law or on facts, in paragraph Nos.6 to 8 of the counter affidavit, there is an undertaking to the effect that the 6th respondent had sought for an approval and for making payment of the differential GST at 6%, which stood enhanced with effect from 18.07.2022. Paragarph Nos.6, 7 & 8 of the counter affidavit of the 6th respondent reads as under: “6. It is submitted that the current prevailing rate of 12% GST was calculated while preparing the estimate. Hence, the approval and fund for making payment for the 6% difference cost has to be obtained from the competent authority. Action has been taken by this respondent to settle the 6% differences cost. After attending v....