^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VDR COLORS AND CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. (SURENDER KUMAR JAIN) vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
AMIT MAHAJAN

Pet. Counsel

Surender Kumar

A.k. Babbar

Res. Counsel

Atul Tripathi

Arvind Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	VDR COLORS AND CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. (SURENDER KUMAR JAIN)
Respondent	PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Jan 25, 2023
Order No.	W.P.(C) 17626/2022
Citation	2023(1) TAXREPLY 6928
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter-alia, impugning a Show Cause Notice dated 06.10.2022 (hereafter ‘impugned SCN’) calling upon the petitioner to show cause why its registration under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 not be cancelled. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 21.10.2022 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’) cancelling the petitioner’s registration pursuant to the said Show Cause Notice. 2. The petitioner has assailed the impugned SCN on the ground that it does not disclose any reason or ground for proposing cancellation of its registration and therefore none that could be addressed by the petitioner. 3. It is necessary to refer to the impugned SCN, which indicates that the only reason for which the petitioner’s registration was proposed to be cancelled was stated as, “others”. 4. Clearly, the impugned SCN fails to disclose any reason for the proposed action, a....