^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

UNISAMIYA RAMJUBHAI BAPDA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

Pet. Counsel

Neel P Lakhani

Pm Lakhani

Res. Counsel

Shruti Pathak

Petitioner / Applicant	UNISAMIYA RAMJUBHAI BAPDA
Respondent	STATE OF GUJARAT
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Oct 17, 2023
Order No.	R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 18316 of 2023
Citation	2023(10) TAXREPLY 8210
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER 1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being CR No. 11993007230192 of 2023 registered with Gandhidham B Division Police Station, Dist. Kachchh East Gandhidham for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such for which custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that present applicant is a casual helper and he is working since January, 2023. Present applicant is falsely implicated in the offence and he has nothing to do with the offence. He has not taken any benefit at the instructio....