^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

UMESH ELECTRICALS vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER TUTICORIN-1 ASSESSMENT CIRCLE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

P. Selvakumar

Res. Counsel

R. Suresh Kumar

C .deepak

Petitioner / Applicant	UMESH ELECTRICALS
Respondent	COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER TUTICORIN-1 ASSESSMENT CIRCLE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 1, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD) No. 17701 of 2024 and W. M. P. (MD)No. 15186, 15187 & 15189 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 11182
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 20.02.2024 for the assessment year 2017-18 bearing reference in No. ZD330224112844R. 3. The impugned order has preceded the notices in ASMT-10 dated 14.03.2023, DRC 01A dated 21.07.2023 and DRC 01 dated 05.09.2023. The petitioner was also issued with a notice for personal hearing on 11.09.2023 through GST common portal. 4. It appears that the petitioner has failed to take advantage of the same and has thus, suffered with adverse order in the hands of the respondent. The petitioner seeks one opportunity to explain the case. 5. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has a fair case to establish that there is no mismatch between the Return in GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B. 6. The learned counsel for the....