^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

UDAY EVENTS AND INNOVATIONS vs. THE SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

Pet. Counsel

P.a.augustian

Swathy E.s.

Res. Counsel

P.r.sreejith

Petitioner / Applicant	UDAY EVENTS AND INNOVATIONS
Respondent	THE SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Oct 7, 2020
Order No.	WP(C).No.19134 OF 2020(N)
Citation	2020(10) TAXREPLY 3415
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner which is stated to be a firm engaged in the business of organizing events, activities, conferences and seminars, is aggrieved by the non extension of the period of registration granted to it by Ext.P1 registration certificate under the GST Act. It is stated that as a casual trader, it had obtained Ext.P1 registration for the period from 25.2.2020 to 31.03.2020, and during the said period, the petitioner had conducted certain events in the course of his business. During the said period, the petitioner had also issued GST invoices to its clients for the services rendered by it to the said clients. It is stated that on account of the Covid-19 pandemic situation, the petitioner firm could not complete the entire work by 31.03.2020 and further, could not apply for an extension of the registration online for another 90 days, since it was not able to access the online portal owing to the expiry of its registration. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction t....