Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
Pet. Counsel
Ravi Raghavan
Res. Counsel
---

Petitioner / Applicant

TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT. LTD.
Respondent UNION OF INDIA
Court Karnataka High Court
State

Karnataka

Date Oct 12, 2023
Order No.

WP 22952 / 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8117
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Sri Ravi Raghavan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, is heard on grant of ad interim order. The petitioner has impugned Show Causes Notices dated 05.08.2023, 06.10.2023 and 27.09.2023 [Annexures-A.1, A.2 and B]. Sri Ravi Raghavan submits that in the circumstances of the case where the GST returns are filed after the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court conclusively holding that the salaries and other expenses would attract the GST, three different authorities have issued the impugned notices reading the provisions of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act without considering such decision. In consideration thereof, the interim order is granted as prayed for until further orders. The respondents are at liberty to seek vacation of the interim order. Sri Vinay Venugopal, the learned CGC, is called upon to accept notice for the first respondent. Ms. Jyoti M. Maradi, the learned High Court Government Pleader, is called upon to accept notice for the second, fifth, sixth and se....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).