^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

THENDRAL RECREATION CLUB vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S. SRIMATHY

Pet. Counsel

B.rooban

Res. Counsel

R.suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	THENDRAL RECREATION CLUB
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 21, 2023
Order No.	W.P.(MD).No. 23075 of 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 8033
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the order passed in Reference No.ZA330323105569Q dated 21.03.2023 and to direct the respondents to revoke the cancellation of petitioner's GSTN registration No. GSTIN.33AAGAT4058G1Z1. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner was unaware of the cancellation of the Registration Certificate and after some time, the petitioner was informed by the other end tax payers that the petitioner GSTN registration was cancelled. Then only the petitioner came to know of his GSTN registration stood cancelled. Thereafter, the Petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority. The appellate authority has rejected the appeal on the ground that it was beyond the period of limitation. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in identical circumstances, this Court, in the case of Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others (W.....