^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

K. R. SHRIRAM
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Sanjeev Nair

Lumiere Law

Res. Counsel

Megha Bajaria

Sumit Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Aug 13, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 11298 OF 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10735
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P.C. 1. The order dated 29th May 2024 has been impugned on various grounds. One of the grounds is that the appeal has been dismissed on the basis that the appeal has not been signed by authorised signatory and the Appellant has not submitted Board Resolution under the Companies Act, 1956, appointing the said person as authorised signatory to sign the appeals, documents or any other proof of his being authorised signatory of Appellant. Appeal has been signed and verified by one Jitendra Ambre. We find in the impugned order the Appellate Authority admits that an affidavit has been signed and verified by the same Jitendra Ambre reiterating the arguments made during the personal hearing. In our view, if the Appellate Authority wanted to verify the authority of Jitendra Ambre, he was duty bound to call upon Appellant, if he had any doubts with regard to the authority. In this case, in our view, if only the Appellate Authority had bothered to check the GST portal of Appellant, he woul....