^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SWAPAN KUMAR GOGOI vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
(Gauhati High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

Pet. Counsel

S Borthakur

D Gogoi

J Abbas

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	SWAPAN KUMAR GOGOI
Respondent	THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
Court	Gauhati High Court
State	Assam
Date	Sep 26, 2024
Order No.	WP(C)/7492/2019
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 12059
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Heard Mr. J. Abbas, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for all the respondents, except the respondent Nos.3 & 4. 2. The petitioner’s case is that the petitioner had participated in a tender process for construction of wholesale fish markets in the district of Dhubri, Barpeta, Hailakandi and Goalpara in the State of Assam. The petitioner had submitted his bid price of Rs. 2,32,14,600/- for construction of the wholesale fish market only in respect with Goalpara district. Being the lowest bidder the petitioner’s tender was accepted and he was allotted the contract work. The petitioner’s grievance is that while the NIT had been issued at the time the Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘2003 Act’) was in force, the petitioners 2nd and 3rd running bills have been released to the petitioner after making deductions, in terms of the Assam Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter ....