Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SUSHIL KUMAR vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Pet. Counsel
P.k.s. Phoolka
Res. Counsel
Samina Dhir

Petitioner / Applicant

SUSHIL KUMAR
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB
Court Punjab and Haryana High Court
State

Punjab

Date Sep 22, 2020
Order No.

CRM-M-28841-2020

Citation

2020(9) TAXREPLY 3368
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. Sushil Kumar, Excise and Taxation Officer, presently posted at Mandi Gobindgarh, has filed this petition against order dated 11th September, 2020 rejecting prayer for anticipatory bail, in FIR No. 9, dated 21st August, 2020 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7, 7(a) and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Phase-1, Mohali. 2. The FIR registered was a sequel of information received by the Vigilance Bureau that Som Nath owner of Sadhu Transport R/o Phagwara had been indulging in tax evasion in connivance with the officers/ officials of Excise and Taxation Department, Punjab. It is alleged that the tax was being evaded by ensuring that there was no checking or verification of the documents or goods, while being transported to & from State of Punjab. Heavy monthly amounts were being paid as bribe to the officers and officials of taxation department to ensure the sa....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)