^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SUMIT GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUBHASH CHAND

Pet. Counsel

Nitin Kumar Pasari

Res. Counsel

Parth S.a. Swaroop Pati

Anurag Vijay

Petitioner / Applicant	SUMIT GUPTA
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Jul 31, 2024
Order No.	B. A. No. 4764 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10585
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 122

☍

Section 132

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, namely, Sumit Gupta @ Sumit Kumar Gupta with prayer to release him on bail in connection with Complaint Case No.1280 of 2024 registered under sections 132 (1) (b), 132 (1) (c) and Section 132 (5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Special Court, Economic Offences, Jamshedpur. 2. Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that as per the allegations made in the prosecution report under Section 167 of the Code, the petitioner being an individual is involved in creating fake companies/ firms and appointing their Directors/ Partners/ Proprietors, who is further involved in passing on the inadmissible Input Tax Credit and for which almost Rs. 522.91 crores has illegally been passed on as inadmissible Input Tax Credit of Goods and Services Tax making huge loss to the Government Excheque....