Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SUGAN LIFESTYLE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF GST & CE AND OTHER
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ANITA SUMANTH
Pet. Counsel
Raghav Rajeev Menon
Res. Counsel
R.hemalatha

Petitioner / Applicant

SUGAN LIFESTYLE
Respondent ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF GST & CE AND OTHER
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Feb 5, 2021
Order No.

W.P. No.14530 of 2020

Citation

2021(2) TAXREPLY 3965
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The petitioner has sought a mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to file Form GST TRAN-2 and allow it to claim Input Tax Credit on goods held in its stock in relation to which invoices/duty paying documents are unavailable. Both on 24.11.2020 and 04.01.2021, directions were issued to the Nodal Officer to hear the petitioner and pass orders on the representation. The matter was listed today for production of orders. However on 08.01.2021 a memo appears to be filed by the learned counsel for the respondents to the effect that representation dated 28.01.2020 has been filed before the Nodal officer, who is not arrayed as a party. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to file a representation before the correct officer. In such circumstances, the mandamus sought for in this writ petition cannot be granted. 3. This writ petition is dismissed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law. No costs. ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)