^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SUBHASHIS MOJUMDER vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Pet. Counsel

D. Basu Thakur.

Res. Counsel

Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee

Petitioner / Applicant	SUBHASHIS MOJUMDER
Respondent	THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	May 14, 2024
Order No.	W. P. A. 10191 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9878
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
1. Mr. Thakur, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the prayer challenging the order of cancellation of the registration of the petitioner effected on 27th May 2020 though, has not been incorporated, yet the writ petitioner by way of the appeal under Section 107 (1) of the GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) having challenged the self-same order, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction is competent to do complete justice. As such the petition be treated as a challenge to the order of cancellation of registration effected on 27th May, 2020. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that a shows cause notice dated 16th March 2020 was issued calling upon the petitioner as to why the registration of the petitioner under the said Act, shall not be cancelled for the petitioner having failed to file its returns for a continuous period of 6 months. Although, the petitioner had responded to the same, by an order dat....