^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SS STEEL INDIA CORPORATION vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (STATE TAX) (GST) & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

Raja Karthikeyan

Res. Counsel

J.k. Jayaselan

Petitioner / Applicant	SS STEEL INDIA CORPORATION
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (STATE TAX) (GST) & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 1, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD)No. 21018 of 2023 and W. M. P. (MD)No. 17490 of 2023
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11271
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the summary of the Assessment Order passed under Section 73 of the SGST Act, dated 01.12.2022. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite a direction of this Court, directing the respondents to furnish a copy of the Assessment Order, till date, the respondents have not furnished the copy for the petitioner to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. 3. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents. 4. The petitioner has been writing several letters asking the respondents to furnish the copy of the Assessment Order for the petitioner to file a statutory appeal. Despite the same, it appears that the respondents have not issued a certified copy of the order either posting it in the Web portal or by serving it manually. 5. Be that as it may, I am of the view that the pet....