Login | Register
GST Library
Dynamic Website Plans
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SRINIVASA SHETTY vs. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER O/O & OTHER
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Pet. Counsel
Prajwal Swamy M.
Res. Counsel
Hema Kumar.k

Petitioner / Applicant

SRINIVASA SHETTY

Respondent THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER O/O & OTHER
Court Karnataka High Court
State

Karnataka

Date Mar 19, 2025
Order No.

WRIT PETITION NO. 7313 OF 2025 ( T-RES )

Citation

2025(3) TAXREPLY 12765
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a. Issue a writ of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent under Section 74 of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017. b. Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to re-determine the tax demand under Section 73 of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017. c. Direct the respondent to allow the petitioner the benefits of the amnesty scheme u/s 128A of the CGST/KGST Act. d. Pass such other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the material on record, in particular, the impugned order at Annexure-A in order to point out that though the same is styled as an order under Section 74 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short), in reality, the said order is passed by invoking Section 73 of....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
5
Jul
S
M
T
W
T
F
S