^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SREEDHANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs. STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

GOPINATH P.

Pet. Counsel

G. Mini

A. Kumar

P. J. Anil Kumar

Res. Counsel

Jasmine M M

E C Bineesh

Petitioner / Applicant	SREEDHANYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Respondent	STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Sep 23, 2024
Order No.	WP(C) Nos. 33109 OF 2024 and 33117 OF 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 12555
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT [WP(C) Nos.33109/2024, 33117/2024] Can a person who enters into a contract with the Government or its agencies that contains a specific clause that the rate quoted shall be inclusive of ‘GST & other taxes’ turn around and claim that he is entitled to Goods & Services Tax (GST) over and above the rate quoted by him? This is the short question that arises for consideration in these cases. 2. Petitioners are common in these two writ petitions. Since the issues arising for consideration in these two writ petitions are identical, these writ petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment. The exhibits and the parties referred to in this judgment are they are marked and they appear in W.P.(C.) No.33109 of 2024, unless otherwise indicated. 3. The Petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in undertaking contracts for construction of roads and bridges and is stated to be a registered ‘A class’ Contractor with the Kerala P....