^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SOURAV KUMAR MAITY vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Pet. Counsel

Arundhuti Barai.

Res. Counsel

Anirban Ray

T. M .siddiqui

Petitioner / Applicant	SOURAV KUMAR MAITY
Respondent	THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	May 22, 2024
Order No.	WPA 12100 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9890
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
1. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia praying for a direction upon the respondents to in effect restore the petitioner’s registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). 2. It is the petitioner’s case that on or about 29th March, 2022, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice for cancellation of registration of the petitioner. Since the petitioner could not respond to the said show cause, the order of cancellation dated 29th March, 2022 had been passed. It is submitted that although, the petitioner had preferred an appeal, the appellate authority without considering the merits was pleased to dismiss the appeal by an order dated 9th November, 2023 on the ground of limitation. 3. Ms. Barai, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner was and is all along ready and willing to comply with the provisions of said....