Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SOUMYA RANJAN KAR vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS
(Orissa High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S. MURALIDHAR
B.P. ROUTRAY
Pet. Counsel
A. Sanganeria
Res. Counsel
Suman Pattanayak

Petitioner / Applicant

SOUMYA RANJAN KAR
Respondent STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS
Court Orissa High Court
State

Odisha

Date Feb 15, 2021
Order No.

W.P.(C) No. 5241 of 2021

Citation

2021(2) TAXREPLY 3899
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Heard Mr. A. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. Suman Pattanayak, learned Additional Government Advocate for State-Opposite Parties. 2. Mrs. Pattanayak accepts notice for the Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present writ petition being identical to W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020, the same may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 18th February, 2020, passed in W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020. 4. Mrs. S. Pattanayak, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 does not dispute the said position. 5. By way of this writ petition, the Petitioner has challenged the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising out of change in tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) with effect from 1st July, 2017. 6. Batch of writ petitions are being filed on this issue. The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficu....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)