^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SONALI METAL INDUSTRIES LLP & OTHER vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , COIMBATORE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

G. Natarajan

Res. Counsel

V. Prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	SONALI METAL INDUSTRIES LLP & OTHER
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , COIMBATORE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 19, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 14955 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 16231 & 16234 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10056
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER In this writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2024 with regard to the imposition of tax, interest and penalty is challenged. The petitioner is engaged in the business of trading of metal scraps. A surprise inspection was conducted at the petitioner's registered place of business and other branches in August 2023. This was followed by a show cause notice dated 03.10.2023. The petitioner replied to such show cause notice seeking an extension of time on the ground that notices were received in respect of five financial years and that the petitioner is in the process of gathering the required data to submit a detailed reply. The impugned order was issued in the above facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is part of a group of entities and that such group includes Sonali Extrusion Private Limited and Shriniwas Impex. Since the licence for procurement of metal scrap was issued to Sonali Extrusion Private Limited, he sub....