^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SISIR S.V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER vs. HE KERALA LOK AYUKTA, BHIMA ENTERPRISES ELANKATHU COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, B. GOVINDAN, SURESH KUMAR
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S.MANIKUMAR
SHAJI P.CHALY

Pet. Counsel

A.k.preetha

C.anil Kumar

Res. Counsel

Petitioner / Applicant	SISIR S.V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Respondent	HE KERALA LOK AYUKTA, BHIMA ENTERPRISES ELANKATHU COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, B. GOVINDAN, SURESH KUMAR
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Aug 18, 2020
Order No.	WP(C).No.16957 OF 2020(T)
Citation	2020(8) TAXREPLY 3219
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner of State Goods and Services Department, Thiruvananthapuram, has sought for a writ of certiorari to quash Exhibit P1 complaint made against him by M/s. Bhima Enterprises, Thiruvananthapuram, represented by its Managing Director, before the Lok Ayukta, Thiruvananthapuram. 2. Further, petitioner has sought for a mandamus directing the Kerala Lok Ayukta to consider Exhibit P1 complaint in accordance with law and dispose of the same expeditiously. 3. Contrary to second prayer, the petitioner has also sought for a declaration that Exhibit P1 complaint as not maintainable under Section 157 (2) of the Kerala Goods and Services Act, 2017. 4. We have heard Mrs. A.K. Preetha, learned counsel for petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 5. Material on record discloses that M/s. Bhima Enterprises represented by its Managing Director has filed complaint No.440 of 2018 (D), seeking for a declaration under Section 14 of the Kerala....