^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SIEMENS LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

K. R. SHRIRAM
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Sriram Sridharan

Nishtha Shrivastava

Res. Counsel

Jitendra Mishra

Sangeeta Yadav

Petitioner / Applicant	SIEMENS LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Sep 3, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION(ST) NO. 27011 OF 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 10778
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P.C. : 1. This Petition is impugning an Order-in-Appeal dated 22nd February 2024 (issued on 27th February 2024) passed by respondent No. 2. By the said Order-in-Appeal, petitioner’s appeal was dismissed on the following grounds: (i) that the Petitioner has not submitted Board Resolution appointing the Authorized Signatory to sign Appeal documents under Companies Act, 1956; (ii) that the Authorized Signatory has not put her name under her signature; (iii) that there was a delay in filing of the Appeal of 27 days; (iv) that the Petitioner has made payment of pre-deposit vide DRC-03 which is not a correct mode of payment of pre-deposit. 2 The very first ground on the basis on which the appeal has been dismissed is that the appeal has not been signed by authorised signatory and appellant has not submitted Board Resolution under the Companies Act, 1956, appointing the said person as authorised signatory to sign the appeals, documents or any other proof of hi....