^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SIDDHAN INTELLIGENCE PRIVATE LTD. vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT, VANAGARAM, RANGE III, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

B.raveendran

Res. Counsel

Rajnish Pathiyil

Petitioner / Applicant	SIDDHAN INTELLIGENCE PRIVATE LTD.
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT, VANAGARAM, RANGE III, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 29, 2023
Order No.	W.P.No. 28688 of 2023 And W.M.P.No. 28241 of 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 8170
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 30

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 07.12.2022 issued in Form GST REG-19 cancelling the GST registration obtained by the petitioner. 4. The impugned order precedes a Show Cause Notice dated 25.11.2022 to which, the petitioner has also not filed any reply. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had no business and no returns were filed by the petitioner. 6. It is submitted that the petitioner's failed to file a regular return and therefore, unaware of the proceedings initiated on 25.11.2022, GST registration was cancelled. It is further submitted that no prejudice or harm will be caused to the respondent, if the cancellation ....