^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SIDDH TRADING CO. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Pet. Counsel

Sandeep Gupta

Ravi Kumar Surtani

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	SIDDH TRADING CO.
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 31, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 156 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 10070
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Surtani, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Sarin, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenge the validity of an order dated 03.02.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3, imposing liability of making payment of Rs. 2,90,250/- upon the petitioner. The petitioner has also challenged the validity of an order dated 04.05.2024 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal)-II, State Tax, Ayodhya, dismissing an appeal filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid order. 3. It is recorded in the order that during checking on 03.02.2024 Vehicle No.UP-35-T-9019 was intercepted and it was found that the Part B had not been issued in support of the E-Way Bill of the goods being transported. Accordingly, penalty was imposed on the petit....