^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHRI VIKLAP JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ MITHAL
RAJIV JOSHI

Pet. Counsel

Anil Prakash Mathur

Res. Counsel

B.k.singh Raghuvanshi

Petitioner / Applicant	SHRI VIKLAP JAIN
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 25, 2018
Order No.	WRIT TAX No. - 805 of 2018
Citation	2018(5) TAXREPLY 3036
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 70

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner claims that he is running a hotel and a Desi wine shop. He has been issued summons dated 8.5.2018 under Section 70 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Superintendent, Office of the Chief Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Meerut to appear in person before him on 10.5.2018 at 12.45 hours to give evidence on such matters concerning the enquiry as he may be asked and produce the documents and record mentioned in the schedule for examination. In pursuance to the above summoned, the petitioner had not attended the office of the Chief Commissioner, rather it is alleged that his wife went to the office and requested for granting a month's time as the petitioner was reported to be out of station. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court seeking direction upon the respondents to allow him to appear along with the counsel only during the o....