^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHREEHARI REALTECH PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

JASPREET SINGH
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA

Pet. Counsel

Tushar Mittal

Parth Anand

Res. Counsel

A.s.g.i.

Petitioner / Applicant	SHREEHARI REALTECH PVT. LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jun 7, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 152 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 9857
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Shri Chinmay Seth, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and Shri Saurabh Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No.1, who has filed his memo of appearance, which is taken on record. 2. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the aforesaid petition on the ground of availability of statutory remedy as provided under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It is submitted that in view of the aforesaid statutory remedy, the petitioner can very well avail the remedy of appeal and in the light thereof, the petition is not maintainable. 3. Refuting the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the impugned orders are patently illegal and they suffer from vice of violation of principles of the natural....