^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHREE TEFCON (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
DONADI RAMESH JJ

Pet. Counsel

Nikhil Pandey

Nishant Mishra

Res. Counsel

Gopal Verma

Krishna Agarawal

Petitioner / Applicant	SHREE TEFCON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 6, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 420 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9597
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Rule 97A

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, respectively. They are taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Nikhil Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. 3. Present petition has been filed for the following relief : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents no. 2, 3 and 4 to resolve the technical glitch on the portal so that the three refund applications submitted by the petitioner for the months of July'17, Aug'17 & Sep'17 may be decided by respondent by respondent no. 4 OR in the alternative the respondent no. 4 be directed to process the three refund applications manually in terms of Rule 97A of the CGST Rules, 2017." 4. On 20.03.2024, we passed the below quoted order : "1. At present, it does appear, the petitioner filed three refu....