^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHREE ADINATH CREATION vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, COIMBATORE.
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

P. Rajkumar

Res. Counsel

T.n.c. Kaushik

Petitioner / Applicant	SHREE ADINATH CREATION
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER, COIMBATORE.
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 25, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 10949 of 2024 And W. M. P . No. 12046 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 9692
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 10.09.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because the notices and impugned order were only uploaded on the portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. The petitioner states that he became aware of the order only upon receipt of a communication regarding the attachment of the petitioner's bank account. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the bank statement of the petitioner and pointed out that a sum of Rs. 3,09,574/-, which covers tax, interest and penalty, was appropriated from the petitioner's bank account on 28.02.2024. By further submitting that the tax proposal pertains to discrepancy between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto populated GSTR 2B, he submits that the petitioner has necessary ....