^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHRAWAN vs. STATE OF HARYANA
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ANOOP CHITKARA

Pet. Counsel

Vinod Ghai

Kanika Ahuja

Res. Counsel

Mamta Singla Talwar

Petitioner / Applicant	SHRAWAN
Respondent	STATE OF HARYANA
Court	Punjab and Haryana High Court
State	Punjab
Date	Jun 29, 2022
Order No.	CRM-M-26610-2022
Citation	2022(6) TAXREPLY 5979
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 160 30.04.2019 Civil Line Sonipat, District Sonipat 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and 132 GST Act 1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail. 2. In paragraphs 23 and 24 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents. 3. The allegations are of fraud related to GST invoices. 4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family. 5. Ld. counsel representing the State opposes bail. REASONING: 6. A perusal of para 6 of the status report filed by concerned Dy SP, it is....