^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHEELIN NADH vs. THE COMMISSIONER, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT AND OTHER
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

Pet. Counsel

P.mohamed Sabah

Saipooja

Res. Counsel

Thushara James

Petitioner / Applicant	SHEELIN NADH
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT AND OTHER
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Oct 7, 2020
Order No.	WP (C). No. 21013 OF 2020 (B)
Citation	2020(10) TAXREPLY 3393
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner, who is stated to be a driver by profession and the registered owner of the goods carriage vehicle that was detained by the 3 rd respondent in terms of Section 129 of the GST Act, alleges that the detention was not justified since it was for reasons totally unconnected with the vehicle, and had more to do with incomplete information furnished by the consignor of the goods. 2. On a perusal of Ext.P3 order passed by the respondents, I find that the goods have been detained on account of various defects in the documents that accompanied the transportation of the goods as per the provisions of the GST Act and Rules. In that view of the matter, I do not see the detention to be unjustified. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. Taking note of the plea of the petitioner for an expeditious release of the vehicle that is detained, I direct that if the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee for ....