^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHABINA ENTERTAINMENT vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SONAK
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Ranit Basu

Maitri Malde

Dua Shaikh

Res. Counsel

Jyoti Chavan

Petitioner / Applicant	SHABINA ENTERTAINMENT
Respondent	STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Dec 2, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 28837 OF 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11760
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
PC:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the impugned order dated 10 July 2024. 3. In paragraph 8 of the Petition, the Petitioner has simply pleaded that “in light of wrongful actions by the Respondents, there is no alternate efficacious remedy and this Hon’ble Court must be pleased to the exercise the discretion vested in it under Article 226 of the Constitution of India”. 4. There are no averments based upon which we are persuaded to depart from the practice of exhaustion of alternate remedies before which a Petition is directly entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5. In similar circumstances, we rejected Writ Petition No. 12695 of 2024 (Atharvan Minerals Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India & Ors) by observing that no case was made to depart from the practice of exhausting alternate remedies. 6. Recently, by our judgment and order dated 11 November 2024 in Writ Petition ....