^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SCOPE PROMOTERS P. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI & ANOTHER
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA

Pet. Counsel

Ruchir Bhatia

Abhishek Anand

Res. Counsel

Arnav Kumar

Shreeya Singh

Petitioner / Applicant	SCOPE PROMOTERS P. LTD.
Respondent	COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI & ANOTHER
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Aug 12, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 11151/2024 & CM APPL. 46090/2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10530
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the cancellation order dated 15.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order), whereby the petitioner’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was cancelled. 4. The petitioner claims that it owns a hotel – Bloom, 17A/32, WEA Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, New Delhi 110005 – the operation and management of which were handed over to another company. The petitioner claims that its office is also located in the same building of the hotel at fourth floor. The petitioner states that in the first week of October 2023 certain officials of the respondents had visited the hotel enquiring about the petitioner’s details, however, the person at the reception desk was unable to provide the same as the company managing the hotel was recently engaged. 5. Thereafter, the proper offi....