^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SATYAM ENTERPRISES vs. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA

Pet. Counsel

Rakesh Kumar

Parveen Kumar Gambhir

Res. Counsel

Rajeev Aggarwal

Petitioner / Applicant	SATYAM ENTERPRISES
Respondent	COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Jul 3, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 8904/2024, CM No. 36335/2024 & CM No. 36336/2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10138
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 29

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the Show Cause Notice dated 17.08.2020 (hereafter the impugned SCN) and the order dated 27.08.2020 (hereafter the impugned order) passed pursuant to the impugned SCN be set aside. 2. The respondent authorities had issued the impugned SCN calling upon the petitioner to show cause why the petitioner’s GST Registration (GSTIN: 07AADHH0053H1ZP) should not be cancelled. The reason set out in the impugned SCN reads as: “Any Taxpayer other than composition taxpayer has not filed returns for a continuous period of six months.” The petitioner was called upon to file its response to the impugned SCN within a period of seven working days from the date of the service of the notice. 3. Concededly, the petitioner did not respond to the impugned SCN. Resultantly, the proper officer passed the impugned order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration for t....